Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Life Space Assessment in Individuals With Vestibular Disorders.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Life Space Assessment (LSA) is a self-report measure that allows clinicians to determine how often someone moves around in his or her environment with or without assistance. Presently, there are no reliable and valid measures that capture all 3 aspects of mobility (ie, mobility frequency, distance, and assistance needed) for individuals with vestibular disorders. The purpose of this study was to describe life space and to determine the reliability and concurrent validity of the LSA as a tool to measure mobility and function in individuals with balance and vestibular disorders. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight participants (mean age of 55 ± 16.7 years) experiencing dizziness or imbalance who were seeking the care of an otoneurologist were recruited. Participants completed the LSA, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: The mean LSA score of the sample was 75/120 ± 30. The LSA demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91). The LSA was negatively correlated with the DHI total score (ρ = -0.326, P < 0.01), DHI physical subscore (ρ = -0.229, P = 0.02), DHI functional subscore (ρ = -0.406, P < 0.01), and DHI emotional subscore (ρ = -0.282, P < 0.01). The LSA was positively correlated with both the physical (ρ = 0.422, P < 0.01) and mental (ρ = 0.362, P < 0.01) composite scores of the SF-12. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Similar to the findings in community-dwelling older adults, the LSA demonstrated excellent test-retest and internal consistency in individuals with vestibular disorders. The LSA is a valid and reliable tool for measuring mobility and function in individuals with vestibular disorders.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A317).

Changes in Cortical Activation During Dual-Task Walking in Individuals With and Without Visual Vertigo.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Persons with vestibular disorders are known to have slower gait speed with greater imbalance and veering during dual-task walking than healthy individuals, but the cerebral mechanisms are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether individuals with visual vertigo (VV) have different cerebral activation during dual-task walking compared with control subjects. METHODS: Fourteen individuals with VV and 14 healthy controls (CON) were included (mean 39 years old, 85% women). A cross-sectional experimental study consisting of 4 combinations of 2 surfaces (even and uneven) and 2 task conditions (single- and dual-task) was performed. Participants walked over an even (level flooring) or uneven (wood prisms underneath carpeting) surface, either quietly or while reciting every other letter of the alphabet. Changes in cerebral activation over the bilateral prefrontal cortices were recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy during 4 task conditions relative to quiet standing. Gait speed and cognitive performance were recorded. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences in cognitive performance. Both groups slowed when walking on an uneven surface or performing a dual-task; participants in the VV group walked more slowly than those in the CON group in all conditions. Participants with VV had decreased cerebral activation in the bilateral prefrontal regions in comparison to CON participants in all conditions. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Participants with VV had lower prefrontal cortex activation than CON participants during dual-task walking. Lower cortical activity in those with VV may be due to shifted attention away from the cognitive task to prioritize maintenance of dynamic balance.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A303).

The development of the ICF vestibular environmental scale.

UNLABELLED: People with vestibular disorders report changes in symptoms based on their environment with many situations increasing their symptoms. The purpose of this paper was to utilize the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) from the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe common environmental triggers for dizziness in persons living with balance and vestibular disorders. A multi-centre cross-sectional study was conducted with four different centres on three different continents, including patients from the United States (Pittsburgh), Germany (Munich), Jordan (Amman) and Saudi Arabia (Riyadh). SUBJECTS: Three hundred eighty one persons with vestibular disorders participated. METHODS: A 9-item questionnaire (the Vestibular Environmental Scale) was developed from existing ICF items, which were compared to Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores. Sixty-five percent of participants reported that "quick movements in the vicinity" increased symptoms, "crowds" at 45%, and "design of buildings, e.g. narrow hallways, stairs, elevators" at 42%. The "crowds" item was a good positive predictor of psychogenic vertigo (OR 1.8, 95% Confidence Interval 1.03-3.16), while "food" (OR 0.47, 95% Confidence Interval 0.17-1.29) and "light" (OR 0.41 95% Confidence Interval 0.23-0.75) were negative predictors of psychogenic vertigo. There also was a positive correlation between the number of triggers and DHI score (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.47, p < 0.0001). Sixty-eight percent of the subjects reported an increase in symptoms with between 1 and 4 environmental triggers. In our cross cultural sample, environmental triggers affect dizziness in persons living with balance and vestibular disorders. The use of items from the ICF of the WHO may help to promote cross cultural sharing of information in persons with dizziness.